Women talkin' 'bout AI

Remainder Humanism & Language Machines

Kimberly Becker & Jessica Parker Season 3

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 57:14

Every time a machine catches up to us, we redraw the line around what makes us human — and call whatever's left the "remainder." This week, Jessica and Kimberly (no guest) dig into Language Machines: Cultural AI and the End of Remainder Humanism by NYU professor Leif Weatherby, and ask whether the whole human-vs-machine contest is a trap.

Along the way: why Emily Bender's "it's just intent" argument doesn't hold up as well as it seems to, why cognition and culture can't actually be separated, a 100-year-old linguistics theory (structuralism) that explains why LLMs work at all, and why the body — not the brain — might come first.


In this episode

  • The core argument — Remainder humanism: defining "human" as whatever's left over once machines take a skill. Why that's a losing game (the "arm wrestling a forklift" bit).
  • Team Bender vs. Team Weatherby — Emily Bender's claim that intent is what separates human language from AI output, and Weatherby's counter: intent doesn't ground meaning, the language system grounds intent.
  • Form vs. function — A quick linguistics 101 detour: language isn't just words on a page, it's what those words do in context ("it's hot in here" as a request, not a weather report).
  • Cognition vs. culture — The WEIRD psychology problem (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and why decades of "universal" cognitive science findings didn't hold up outside that narrow sample.
  • Structuralism, 100 years early — The idea that words get meaning from their relationships to other words, not from pointing at things in the world — and why that theory basically predicted LLMs.
  • Meaning without truth — Why hallucinations are what a meaning-making system with no truth-tracking looks like.
  • Embodiment — Descartes' "I think therefore I am" flipped: feeling comes before thinking, and what that means for machines that don't have bodies.
  • Practical takeaway — How to stop playing defense: quit asking "what can I still do that machines can't," start asking what these systems are trained on, who's represented, and who gets to shape them.


Mentioned in this episode


Personal segment

The episode closes with a quick peach-and-pit check-in — home renovation surprises and a therapy update on sitting with feelings in the body instead of just thinking through them.

Leave us a comment or a suggestion!

Support the show

Contact us: https://www.womentalkinboutai.com/ 








Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.

Your Undivided Attention Artwork

Your Undivided Attention

The Center for Humane Technology, Tristan Harris, Aza Raskin